Employee Survey 2009
Nepal, 2009
Created on
Apr 25, 2019
Last modified
Apr 25, 2019
Page views
420
- Data Files
-
Estonia-2009--full
data-
interviewer comments (a17x)
Data file: Estonia-2009--full data-
Overview
Valid:
96
Type:
Discrete
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| all numbers and data was taken accurately and are correctly calculated | |
| chief accountant could not respind to all questions, other managers were not ava | |
| company does not have separate record-keeping for electricity, internet, water s | |
| cooperative | |
| could not respond to all questions | |
| did not disclose numbers | |
| didn't give exact numbers | |
| didn't have all data available, had to call and for some data had to give estima | |
| didn't have all data on hand, company is in reorganization process | |
| didn't have any problems, numbers directly from reports | |
| didn't know some numbers, so these were approximate | |
| didn't understand all questions, could be wrong answers. Some terms were not und | |
| didn't want to disclose numbers | |
| don't want to disclose some information | |
| everything was accurately calculated, everything was wonderful | |
| everything was quick and understadnable | |
| everything went fast and pleasant, very good cooperation | |
| everything went well ans smoothly | |
| extremely pleasant respondent | |
| financial data from specialized firm - we use their services | |
| good and smooth communicator | |
| good cooperation | |
| good respondent | |
| had attitude that don't know and don't disclose | |
| had problems with numbers, because accountant was on vacation | |
| had problems with understanding questions, translation might not be so good, som | |
| had some problems with understanding questions, | |
| in case of some questions, he was not competent to respondand there was noone to | |
| interview is too long - instead of 1 hour it took 2 hours. During this time the | |
| made interview with accountant the next day | |
| manager gave estimates, they use accounting company's services, expenses related | |
| many answers didn't know and were not answered | |
| no problems, data accurate | |
| no problems, data correct. Refused from next wave interview, because questions a | |
| no problems, only in case of numbers could have made mistakes | |
| no problems, only was a bit in a hurry | |
| no problems, the company is in elimination process | |
| no problems, very good contact | |
| no, had to specify numbers with accountant, but chief accountant was in a busine | |
| no, very good respondent | |
| numbers are accurate | |
| objective contact | |
| only accountant was available, we would have needed also manager | |
| partly accurate, partly approximates | |
| pelasant, objective | |
| pleasant meeting, no problems | |
| questions clarity could be better | |
| questions should be more Estonian and more explained | |
| reliable relationship, accountant could not be till the endi... | |
| respondent didn't see any point of this survey | |
| respondent said that it was too long | |
| respondent spent a lot of time finding numbers | |
| respondent was genuine, outgoing and competent, knew what was saying | |
| respondent was interested and very positive | |
| respondent was very busy | |
| responses could influence, but these are accurate | |
| some answers were estimates | |
| some data accurate, some estimations | |
| some data is not completely accurate, would have wanted advance information abou | |
| some data received by calling different persons | |
| some numbers are accurate, some approximate | |
| some numbers are accurate, some estimates, some could not tell, because company | |
| some numbers are not accurate and approximate | |
| some numbers are not accurate, but estimates | |
| some numbers were a bit estimations | |
| some numbers were checked on a phone, some were estimates | |
| some numbers were estimations | |
| some questions were a bit confusing for respondent | |
| some questions were confusing | |
| there was no accountant | |
| there was no accountant available | |
| too broad choice of questions | |
| too long | |
| too many numbers | |
| very argumentive questions, respondent argued and explained a lot | |
| very bad | |
| very good | |
| very good communicator | |
| very good cooperation | |
| very good respondent, friendly | |
| very objective | |
| very objective and helpful | |
| very pleasant | |
| was not interested | |
| went smoothly, there was no problems | |
| wonderful atmosphere | |
| wonderful cooperation |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Question pretext
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS (Problems occurred/extraordinary circumstances which could influence results)