Login
Login
National Data Archive
An Online Microdata Catalog
  • Home
  • Catalog
  • Citations
    Home / Central Data Catalog / WSM_2008_HIES_V01_M / variable [F1]
central

Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2008

Samoa, 2008
Reference ID
WSM_2008_HIES_v01_M
Producer(s)
Bureau of Statistics
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Apr 25, 2019
Last modified
Apr 25, 2019
Page views
63
  • Study Description
  • Data Description
  • Get Microdata
  • Data Files
  • WLD_2010_DB_v01_M
CSV JSON

Protecting Investors - Rank (pi_rank)

Data file: WLD_2010_DB_v01_M

Overview

Valid: 366
Invalid: 1098
Minimum: 1
Maximum: 183
Type: Continuous
Decimal: 0
Range: -
Format:

Description

Definition
Doing Business measures the strength of minority shareholder protections against directors’ misuse of corporate assets for personal gain. The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor protections: transparency of related-party transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The data come from a survey of corporate and securities lawyers and are based on securities regulations, company laws and court rules of evidence. The ranking on the strength of investor protection index is the simple average of the percentile rankings on its component indicators.

To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about the business and the transaction are used.

Assumptions about the business

The business (Buyer):

- Is a publicly traded corporation listed on the economy’s most important stock exchange. If the number of publicly traded companies listed on that exchange is less than 10, or if there is no stock exchange in the economy, it is assumed that Buyer is a large private company with multiple shareholders.
- Has a board of directors and a chief executive officer (CEO) who may legally act on behalf of Buyer where permitted, even if this is not specifically required by law.
- Is a food manufacturer.
- Has its own distribution network.

Assumption about the transaction

- Mr. James is Buyer’s controlling shareholder and a member of Buyer’s board of directors. He owns 60% of Buyer and elected 2 directors to Buyer’s 5-member board.
- Mr. James also owns 90% of Seller, a company that operates a chain of retail hardware stores. Seller recently closed a large number of its stores.
- Mr. James proposes that Buyer purchase Seller’s unused fleet of trucks to expand Buyer’s distribution of its food products, a proposal to which Buyer agrees. The price is equal to 10% of Buyer’s assets and is higher than the market value.
- The proposed transaction is part of the company’s ordinary course of business and is not outside the authority of the company.
- Buyer enters into the transaction. All required approvals are obtained, and all required disclosures made (that is, the transaction is not fraudulent).
- The transaction causes damages to Buyer. Shareholders sue Mr. James and the other parties that approved the transaction.
National Data Archive

© National Data Archive, All Rights Reserved.