Multi Country Study Survey 2000-2001
Poland, 2000 - 2001
Created on
Apr 25, 2019
Last modified
Apr 25, 2019
Page views
221
- Data Files
-
Belarus-2013-full
data
ECAq44a. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to Parliamentarians - direct impa (ECAq44a)
Data file: Belarus-2013-full data
Overview
Valid:
360
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Range:
-
Format:
Questions and instructions
Literal question
It is often said that firms make unofficial payments/gifts, private payments or other benefits to public officials to gain advantages in the drafting of laws, decrees, regulations, and other binding government decisions. To what extent have the following practices had a direct impact on this establishment?
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to Parliamentarians to affect their votes
Private payments/gifts or other benefits to Parliamentarians to affect their votes
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| -9 | Don't know |
| -8 | Refused |
| -7 | DOES NOT APPLY |
| 1 | No impact |
| 2 | Minor impact |
| 3 | Moderate impact |
| 4 | Major impact |
| 5 | Decisive impact |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Sensitive question, no clarification can be offered
Others
Notes
ECAq44a. Private payments/gifts/other benefits to Parliamentarians - direct impact