National Service Delivery Survey 2004
Uganda, 2004
Created on
Apr 25, 2019
Last modified
Apr 25, 2019
Page views
88
Identification
Survey ID Number
UGA_2004_NSDS_v01_M
Title
National Service Delivery Survey 2004
Country
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Uganda | UGA |
Study type
Service Provision Assessments [hh/spa]
Series Information
The National Service Delivery Survey is conducted every four years by Uganda Buruea of Statistics. This is the second to the one conducted in 2000.
Abstract
The 2004 National Service Delivery Survey (NSDS) collected information on six selected sectors namely Education, Health, Water and Sanitation, Agriculture, Transport and Governance. The survey was aimed at providing information about the performance of the selected sectors for policy formulation, implementation and monitoring at all levels of governance. Two sets of questionnaires were used to collect information: the household questionnaire (service users) and the questionnaire for service providers.
Kind of Data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Unit of Analysis
- Individual
- Household
- Community
- Institution
- Household
- Community
- Institution
Scope
Notes
The survey covered six sectors namely:
- Health -Education
- Agriculture
- Road Infrastructure
- Water and Sanitation
- Governance
- Health -Education
- Agriculture
- Road Infrastructure
- Water and Sanitation
- Governance
Coverage
Geographic Coverage
The survey covered the entire country . A representative sample of 18,000 households was randomly selected from all the 56 districts but only 17,608 households were covered.
Universe
The survey covered all the households that fell in the sample and accepted to be interviewed.
Producers and sponsors
Primary investigators
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) | Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development |
Funding Agency/Sponsor
| Name | Abbreviation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Government of Uganda | GOU | Funding |
| World Bank | WB | Funding |
Other Identifications/Acknowledgments
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Ministry of Education | Advice on designing of data collection instruments |
| Ministry of Health | Advice on designing of data collection instruments |
| Ministry of Agriculture | Advice on designing of data collection instruments |
| IGG's office | Advice on designing of data collection instruments |
| Ministry of local gorvernment | Advice on designing of data collection instruments |
| Ministry of lands and water | Advice on designing of data collection instruments |
Sampling
Sampling Procedure
The sampling design used for collecting primary data was a multi-stage cluster sample. The first stage of sampling involved the selection of Enumeration Areas (EAs). An enumeration area is an area that can be covered by one enumerator at the time of a Census, in most cases this area is equivalent to a village/ cell, while in other cases it is part of the village or many villages. The EAs had been demarcated in preparation for the 2002 Population and Housing Census. A representative sample of at least 30 enumeration areas (EAs) was selected from every district independently.
The sampling process utilized the 2002 Population and Housing Census Sampling Frame using the probability proportional to size (PPS) approach. A total of 1800 EAs (Primary Sampling Units) were targeted in the entire country. A complete listing of households was done in each of the EAs to generate a sampling frame of households from which a sample of households was selected. Within each selected Primary Sampling Unit (PSU), ten (10) households were randomly selected as Secondary Sampling Units (SSU). Overall, the Survey targeted 18,000 households.
The sampling process utilized the 2002 Population and Housing Census Sampling Frame using the probability proportional to size (PPS) approach. A total of 1800 EAs (Primary Sampling Units) were targeted in the entire country. A complete listing of households was done in each of the EAs to generate a sampling frame of households from which a sample of households was selected. Within each selected Primary Sampling Unit (PSU), ten (10) households were randomly selected as Secondary Sampling Units (SSU). Overall, the Survey targeted 18,000 households.
Response Rate
A representative sample of 18,000 households was randomly selected from all the 56 districts but only 17,608 (97.8%)households were covered. Some households were not covered due to insecurity in the districts of Gulu, Lira, Katakwi, Kitgum, and Pader; while in Karamoja region (Kotido, Nakapiripirit and Moroto) due to mobility of the pastoralist communities.
Data Collection
Dates of Data Collection
| Start | End |
|---|---|
| 2004-03-06 | 2004-03-30 |
Time periods
| Start date | End date |
|---|---|
| 2003-03-01 | 2004-03-30 |
Data Collection Mode
Face-to-face [f2f]
Data Collectors
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | UBOS | Ministry of Finance and Economic Development |
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
A household questionnaire was administered in each household, which collected various information on household members including sex, age, literacy, marital status , activity status and ophanhood. The household questionnaire also includes education, health services, immunisation of children under five, housing, water and sanitation, governace, agriculture services, transport services and access to credit (informal and formal) In addition there was a particular section for women aged 15-50years and children under age five.
Data Processing
Data Editing
Manual editing and coding was done using a team of ten well trained persons and one supervisor.
For data entry: CSPro was used, quality checks were embedded in the data entry application, type of data entry was manual and used double entry system to ensure quality, Twenty four data entry operators and two supervisors were employed. One computer programmer was in charge of the overall data processing. He did the final cleaning, tabulation and analysis. Cleaning was done in CSPro and SPSS while tabulation and analysis was done in SPSS.
For data entry: CSPro was used, quality checks were embedded in the data entry application, type of data entry was manual and used double entry system to ensure quality, Twenty four data entry operators and two supervisors were employed. One computer programmer was in charge of the overall data processing. He did the final cleaning, tabulation and analysis. Cleaning was done in CSPro and SPSS while tabulation and analysis was done in SPSS.
Access policy
Contacts
| Name | Affiliation | URL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) | Government of Uganda | ubos@ubos.org | http://www.ubos.org/ |
Access conditions
Data and metadata is provided to you for exclusive use. The data and/or metadata may not be transferred to any other user without prior written authorization from UBOS.
Citation requirements
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download
Disclaimer and copyrights
Disclaimer
The Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) provides these datasets to external users without any warranty or responsibility implied. The Bureau accepts no responsibility for the results and or/implications of any such actions that may result from the use of the data.
Metadata production
DDI Document ID
DDI_UGA_2004_NSDS_v01_M
Producers
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | UBOS | Ministry of Finance, Planning & Economic Development | Documentation of the study |
Date of Metadata Production
2007-03-31
DDI Document version
Version 01 (June 2012): Adopted from "DDI-UGA-UBOS-NSDS-2004-v1.0" DDI that was done by metadata producers mentioned in "Metadata Production" section.